crosuv.blogg.se

Adobe bridge vs acdsee
Adobe bridge vs acdsee













  1. #Adobe bridge vs acdsee update
  2. #Adobe bridge vs acdsee full
  3. #Adobe bridge vs acdsee software
  4. #Adobe bridge vs acdsee license

The interface then splits up the images and labels the groups by camera name. For example, if I took photos with multiple cameras from the same manufacturer that were different models (say the Nikon D600 and D750), I could group them by camera even though their filenames would be in the same format and all of the pictures are in the same directory. The filtering and grouping tools are extremely helpful to find and select specific images. There are a few other additions along with textual search capability. Here is a collection of screen captures that shows off some of the options there. Key commands like CTRL + 1 to 5 give a selected photo or photos the given rating that, in turn, can be shown alone. I use the filtering features a lot while culling photos or trying to select out specific ones. You can also adjust the size of previews on the bottom right of the application through a slider control. Thumbs + Details ViewĪlthough, I usually leave it set to the standard thumbnail view. You can also switch between a few views from the standard thumbnails setup. I could see that being valuable if someone has distinct tasks that work best with a custom interface for each. It looks like you can customize and save workspaces, which I haven’t even touched yet. You can also view some of the embedded EXIF data about the currently selected image and see things like a histogram. There is a lot of functionality to search and filter images based on labels, ratings, exif, and other properties besides doing things like moving or deleting images from the computer. This is where you are able to browse through folders and get a preview of multiple images. Here is a screenshot of primary tab called “manage”. Not ideal, but it works well enough for me in the interim. Until then, I use Adobe’s DNG RAW converter to make duplicates of my CR3 files that I can edit in APSU.

#Adobe bridge vs acdsee update

I’ll update this article when it has been implemented. I’ve been told by staff that they are working on support. I assume that’s the case for all cameras that use CR3.

#Adobe bridge vs acdsee software

NOTE: There is a quirk currently with CR3 RAW photos from the Canon EOS M50 because the software doesn’t currently support it. * Auto-advance, development settings pane, support for HEIF, import/export actions, luminosity selection, customizable keyboard shortcuts in manage mode, and copy/paste masks… to name a few more additions or revisions. This sounds like a way to distribute adjustments. I’ve used it a few times, so more control there should be fun to mess around with. Their site says adjust contrast in specific tones and target brightness ranges. I’m not sure what it offers at this point or if the LUTs are cross-software compatible. Basically non-destructive targeted adjustments with a brush tool. This is a big deal for me because I use it quite a bit. * Develop brush additions: vibrance, saturation, hue, brightness, contrast, and other tools. I see it working and drawing boxes over faces accurately, but I haven’t gotten into anything else about it. Cosplay photos are not an easy task for face detection algorithms when they attempt to match faces to a given person because of makeup and other embellishments in this hobby. Really looking forward to trying it out in detail with my cosplay photography. I could see this being a very useful feature. * Face detection! It will scan photos and help you organize photos based on person. In this video I go over my usual process with the 2019 version: If you are interested in learning more, here is a link to the product page of the current version of the Acdsee Photo Studio Ultimate application. That way I can better explain how their software is currently, rather than talking about an older version and eventually upgrading when I found a new feature I wanted for my personal photography needs. Being on the current version helps me and helps them at the same time. I had made a video about the 2018 version of the program that they noticed.

adobe bridge vs acdsee

I want to see this software become more popular because I do think it’s a solid fully featured photo management and editing application.

#Adobe bridge vs acdsee license

I’ll be shortening the name of this program to “APSU” throughout this article for ease of reading.įull disclosure: they sent me a license to the 2019 version after they approved my application to their affiliate program. It is my “daily driver” application for general photography and initial photo manipulation of stills for my Youtube videos. I got into it after trying a number of similar programs in a search for something that wasn’t “software as a service” like Adobe’s Photoshop/Lightroom software sold now. I feel like I’ve only just started to scratch the surface of what it offers in terms of features. There is a lot of functionality that I won’t be able to cover here. It has a mixture of non-destructive editing as well as layered raster editing.

#Adobe bridge vs acdsee full

This is a full organization and editing environment for photos. I’ve been using Acdsee’s photo software since the 2017 version.















Adobe bridge vs acdsee